Saturday 24 October 2020

Backdated - Results, Queensland 2020

Predictions from the Queensland 2020 state election had a decent success rate of 93.7%, or 89 of 95. 89 out of 95 is also what I would have got by simply following the polling to state there would be no change (except that Whitsunday would return to the LNP after a 2019 expulsion of incumbent Jason Costigan). So my analysis didn't hurt my predictions, but probably weren't worth the effort either. Interestingly,both approaches would have miscalled the same four seats in their six: Caloundra, Hervey Bay, Nicklin and South Brisbane.

But this blog is misleadingly called the Infographinomicon, not the Wordy-spiel-riddled-with-numbers-apedia, so here's the coloured table:

ELECTORATE PREDICTION RESULT
Algester ALP ALP
Aspley LNP ALP
Bancroft ALP ALP
Barron River ALP ALP
Bonney LNP LNP
Broadwater LNP LNP
Buderim LNP LNP
Bulimba ALP ALP
Bundaberg ALP ALP
Bundamba ALP ALP
Burdekin LNP LNP
Burleigh LNP LNP
Burnett LNP LNP
Cairns ALP ALP
Callide LNP LNP
Caloundra LNP ALP
Capalaba ALP ALP
Chatsworth LNP LNP
Clayfield LNP LNP
Condamine LNP LNP
Cook ALP ALP
Coomera LNP LNP
Cooper ALP ALP
Currumbin LNP LNP
Everton LNP LNP
Ferny Grove ALP ALP
Gaven LNP ALP
Gladstone ALP ALP
Glass House LNP LNP
Greenslopes ALP ALP
Gregory LNP LNP
Gympie LNP LNP
Hervey Bay LNP ALP
Hill KAP KAP
Hinchinbrook KAP KAP
Inala ALP ALP
Ipswich ALP ALP
Ipswich West ALP ALP
Jordan ALP ALP
Kawana LNP LNP
Keppel ALP ALP
Kurwongbah ALP ALP
Lockyer LNP LNP
Logan ALP ALP
Lytton ALP ALP
Macalister ALP ALP
Mackay ALP ALP
Maiwar GRN GRN
Mansfield ALP ALP
Maroochydore LNP LNP
Maryborough ALP ALP
McConnel ALP ALP
Mermaid Beach LNP LNP
Miller ALP ALP
Mirani ONP ONP
Moggill LNP LNP
Morayfield ALP ALP
Mount Ommaney ALP ALP
Mudgeeraba LNP LNP
Mulgrave ALP ALP
Mundingburra ALP ALP
Murrumba ALP ALP
Nanango LNP LNP
Nicklin LNP ALP
Ninderry LNP LNP
Noosa IND IND
Nudgee ALP ALP
Oodgeroo LNP LNP
Pine Rivers ALP ALP
Pumicestone ALP ALP
Redcliffe ALP ALP
Redlands ALP ALP
Rockhampton ALP ALP
Sandgate ALP ALP
Scenic Rim LNP LNP
South Brisbane ALP GRN
Southern Downs LNP LNP
Southport LNP LNP
Springwood ALP ALP
Stafford ALP ALP
Stretton ALP ALP
Surfers Paradise LNP LNP
Theodore LNP LNP
Thuringowa ALP ALP
Toohey ALP ALP
Toowoomba North LNP LNP
Toowoomba South LNP LNP
Townsville ALP ALP
Traeger KAP KAP
Warrego LNP LNP
Waterford ALP ALP
Whitsunday LNP LNP
Woodridge ALP ALP

The six incorrect predictions were Aspley, Caloundra, Gaven, Hervey Bay, Nicklin and Brisbane South. In Aspley and Gaven the ALP incumbent held out against the LNP, and in Caloundra, Hervey Bay and Nicklin the ALP defeated the LNP, meaning that the result was stronger than expected for Labor. In Brisbane South the Greens defeated the ALP incumbent. At a superficial level it may be tempting to generalise this into a left-wing shift, but I don't see that as meaningful in Australian politics.

In 2020 the polling was not indicating any radical shift in polling sentiment. Three assumptions were made from this polling: anything considered fairly safe or better (6%+) would be unchanged, that One Nation's decline in polling would prevent them gaining seats and that a breakaway Liberal candidate in Whitsunday would lose his seat back to his party. For the most part these were good assumptions--state wide 2PP swing to Labor was +1.9 and One Nation's first preference was down 6.6 percentage points. However, Hervey Bay had been won in 2017 with a margin of 9.1 and saw an 11.1 pp swing in 2020. That is a weird outlier that wasn't predicted.

Hervey Bay (and Caloundra)

Hervey Bay covers Frasier Island and the mainland city of Hervey Bay. It was created in 1992. It was first held by Labor for six years, then by One Nation/One Nation Queensland/City Country Alliance for a term during the height of ONP's popularity. Labor recovered the seat in 2001 and held it for 8 years before being defeated by the LNP who kept if for the next decade. This was the situation as it stood in 2020.

The seat was clearly not immune to changing hands, but that hardly sets it apart from many others that behaved predictably.

The incumbent, Edward "Ted" Sorensen, was retiring in 2020. This was likely a significant factor--two other LNP candidates also retired in 2020, one in Pumicestone which was predicted to fall to Labor on this basis and the other in Caloundra which, like Hervey Bay) saw an unpredicted ALP take-over. The retirement of Mark McArdle was not factored into this call. Labor also had three retiring members (Kate Jones, Anthony Lynham and Coralee O'Rourke in the seats of Cooper, Stafford and Mundingburra respectively) but with the swing favouring Labor these all held (Cooper and Stafford were fairly safe, and Mundingburra was assessed as a Labor seat with a single historical outlier.

The lesson here for future (2022+) predictions is to not ignore the importance of incumbency.

Nicklin

With Caloundra explained on similar grounds to Hervey Bay, it remains to be determined what, if anything, can be taken as the oversight in Nicklin, which is the only other seat where Labor seized power. Nicklin was called on the basis that Labor had never won there. This isn't entirely irrelevant--going on history alone allowed us to correctly call 8 LNP and 11 ALP seats, and it's hard to find a seat with a more definitive history than Nicklin. It's also worth noting that Nicklin was won by the second-narrowest margin of 0.14 percentage points (second only to Bundaberg's 0.01).

On this ground I'm happy to treat this as a narrow outlier--no election will ever be perfectly predictable, after all.

Aspley and Gaven

Aspley, Redlands and Gaven were the last three seats predicted, a reliable sign I was running out of any meaningful data to work from. These were essentially tossups, with Aspley and Redlands called one for LNP and one for the ALP as insurance against a unforeseen landslide either way, and Gaven basically decided on a coin flip.

Both of these would have been right to call according to the original poll+pendulum prediction, which was suggesting no change, again emphasising the importance of incumbency in the absence of any other data. (Though, caveat: where electoral history is solid, this can be seen to be more important than the current member).

South Brisbane

South Brisbane was decided much earlier than Aspley or Gaven, and was confidently but wrongly called for ALP on the basis of a strong Labor history (which is likely in any seat the Greens win for the first time) and probably the unspoken recognition that most Australian voters thing in two-party terms.

I'm not sure there is enough data to test whether these are bad assumptions on my part, or South Brisbane is another outlier, but going forward it is important to not dismiss the possibility of a Greens win in a new seat.

No comments:

Post a Comment