Tuesday 23 April 2019

New South Wales Wrap-Up

The candidate lists for the federal election are released tomorrow, after which I will be providing my regular state-by-state summaries of the parties in play. Therefore, it is time to conclude the NSW election coverage with this summary of predictions.

Lower House


In the lower house, we got 86 of the 93 seats correct, which is  a respectable 92%


SEAT FORMERLY PREDICTION RESULT
Albury LIB LIB LIB
Auburn ALP ALP ALP
Ballina GRN GRN GRN
Balmain GRN GRN GRN
Bankstown ALP ALP ALP
Barwon NAT NAT SFF
Bathurst NAT NAT NAT
Baulkham Hills LIB LIB LIB
Bega LIB LIB LIB
Blacktown ALP ALP ALP
Blue Mountains ALP ALP ALP
Cabramatta ALP ALP ALP
Camden LIB LIB LIB
Campbelltown ALP ALP ALP
Canterbury ALP ALP ALP
Castle Hill LIB LIB LIB
Cessnock ALP ALP ALP
Charlestown ALP ALP ALP
Clarence NAT NAT NAT
Coffs Harbour NAT NAT NAT
Coogee LIB ALP ALP
Cootamundra NAT NAT NAT
Cronulla LIB LIB LIB
Davidson LIB LIB LIB
Drummoyne LIB LIB LIB
Dubbo NAT NAT NAT
East Hills LIB ALP LIB
Epping LIB LIB LIB
Fairfield ALP ALP ALP
Gosford ALP ALP ALP
Goulburn LIB LIB LIB
Granville ALP ALP ALP
Hawkesbury LIB LIB LIB
Heathcote LIB LIB LIB
Heffron ALP ALP ALP
Holsworthy LIB LIB LIB
Hornsby LIB LIB LIB
Keira ALP ALP ALP
Kiama LIB LIB LIB
Kogarah ALP ALP ALP
Ku-ring-gai LIB LIB LIB
Lake Macquarie IND IND IND
Lakemba ALP ALP ALP
Lane Cove LIB LIB LIB
Lismore NAT GRN ALP
Liverpool ALP ALP ALP
Londonderry ALP ALP ALP
Macquarie Fields ALP ALP ALP
Maitland ALP ALP ALP
Manly LIB LIB LIB
Maroubra ALP ALP ALP
Miranda LIB LIB LIB
Monaro NAT ALP NAT
Mount Druitt ALP ALP ALP
Mulgoa LIB LIB LIB
Murray NAT NAT SFF
Myall Lakes NAT NAT NAT
Newcastle ALP ALP ALP
Newtown GRN GRN GRN
North Shore LIB LIB LIB
Northern Tablelands NAT NAT NAT
Oatley LIB LIB LIB
Orange SFF ALP SFF
Oxley NAT NAT NAT
Parramatta LIB LIB LIB
Penrith LIB LIB LIB
Pittwater LIB LIB LIB
Port Macquarie NAT NAT NAT
Port Stephens ALP ALP ALP
Prospect ALP ALP ALP
Riverstone LIB LIB LIB
Rockdale ALP ALP ALP
Ryde LIB LIB LIB
Seven Hills LIB LIB LIB
Shellharbour ALP ALP ALP
South Coast LIB LIB LIB
Strathfield ALP ALP ALP
Summer Hill ALP ALP ALP
Swansea ALP ALP ALP
Sydney IND IND IND
Tamworth NAT NAT NAT
Terrigal LIB LIB LIB
The Entrance ALP ALP ALP
Tweed NAT ALP NAT
Upper Hunter NAT NAT NAT
Vaucluse LIB LIB LIB
Wagga Wagga IND IND IND
Wakehurst LIB LIB LIB
Wallsend ALP ALP ALP
Willoughby LIB LIB LIB
Wollondilly LIB LIB LIB
Wollongong ALP ALP ALP
Wyong ALP ALP ALP

The 7 incorrect predictions fall into one of three categories: strong SFF results; unexpected Coalition resilience and Lismore.

The strong SFF results hold Orange while picking up Barwon and Murray. The prediction in Orange was an underestimation of the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party, but should have favoured the Nationals (as written in the text of the previous post) rather than the ALP (as shown in the tables). In the other two seats SFF was not even on my radar. I don't think there is much that can be done to remedy this without polling considering the SFF and other minor parties to give some data to play with.

The swing against the Coallition was not as strong as polling indicated, which saw the parties hold on better than expected, especially the Nationals who did not have accurate polling availible. This was the case in East Hills, Monaro and Tweed. This can be remedied in future by making seperate estimates for Liberal and National polling.

That just leaves Lismore. Previously Nationals, predicted Greens and won by the ALP. This was a weird case where the previous result was a NAT v GRN result. Simplistic predictions of a shift from right to left thus gave this to the Greens, without an appreciation that the Greens polled well by besting Labor and taking the lion's share of their preferences; a shift from the Nationals is unlikely to fall directly to the Greens but instead vest in Labor who then beat and assimilate the Greens vote. This is an oversight on my part not to be repeated.

Upper House


The upper house prediction was as follows:


PARTY CONTINUING ELECTED TOTAL ERROR
Predicted Result Predicted Result
Coalition 9 8 8 17 17 0
Labor 7 8 7 15 14 1
Green 2 2 2 4 4 0
Christian Democrats 1 1 0 2 1 1
Shooters, Fishers & Farmers 1 1 1 2 2 0
Animal Justice 1 0 1 1 2 1
One Nation 0 1 2 1 2 1


Although the error column sums to 4 this is actually only two errors, losses from the predicted results of the ALP and Christian Democrats to the Animal Justice and One Nation parties. The possibility of ALP only einning 7 seats and the Animal Justice Party continuing their previous success to win one were forseeable posibilities but not ones I am too concerned about. There is always some guesswork at the pointy end of the preference count. The failure of the CDP to win a seat, however, is a significant departure from tradition, and the rise of One Nation (again) shooting from 0 to 2 seats is startlling (though probably unlikely to repeat any time soon, given recent scandals involving the US NRA). I think the lesson to be learned from that is not to put too much weight on historic voting trends, particularly for minor parties.



Overall, this was a decently successful set of preductions with a couple of key lessons: don't assume coalition polling is indicative of the Nationals' votes and don't relytoo heavily  on historical patterns in upper house contests.