Turnbull is not a fool.
Firstly, this is Turnbull’s second stab at the Liberal leadership.
If he loses here, he’s almost certain to be infected with Kim Beazley Syndrome.
The major symptoms of KBS include being seen as a safe “rebuilder”, but never
Prime Minister Material; regularly being ousted before an election; and never
becoming Prime Minister. Turnbull would not make this challenge without
confidence in his support.
It’s Monday Night. That’s not just a work night, a high
news-watching night and a night when the 7:30 report is on; it’s also #qanda
night. Tonight is about as high-profile a news night as possible. Tonight is a
high-stakes night for a challenge.
The Canning by-election is this weekend. Undercutting the
Prime Ministership this week could be catastrophic if Abbott loses narrowly.
Either Abbott needs a massive show of support (and all counts suggest the vote
will be very close) or Turnbull needs to win to revamp Liberal support ahead of
this weekend. On the other hand, as Dr Bonham observes
the Libs have a habbit of voting to change leaders in the lead up to
by-elections. Abbott came to power against Turnbull the week of a double
by-election (Higgins and Bradfield) six years ago.
Turnbull has picked his moment, and taken his best shot. If he
cannot win now, he cannot win.
Abbott is not a fool.
Abbott immediately called a party vote within just over five
hours. That gives very little time to recall travelling MPs – most believed to
be on Abbott’s side – rather than waiting a day. While political implications
of waiting a day might be problematic, I’d be surprised if that was given more
weight than keeping the leadership. Abbott knows that, now Turnbull can publically
challenge and canvas, his support will only fall among the party.
Abbott knows he’s in trouble and trying to minimise damage.
And it could work. I’m not saying this is an easily predicted vote; tonight
hangs by a thread from a razor’s edge balanced on a very thin line.
The People of Australia are not fools.
Firstly, I’ve noted previously, betting odds tend to be
reasonably indicative of voting results. True, voting may do so indirectly – people
may bet for their favourites, and the most popular candidates do well in
democracies. In this case, where the public’s preference does not influence the
outcome, sportsbet.com is probably less indicative than previously.
Nevertheless, here’s the odds only a few minutes out:
Source: sportsbet.com
|
AND NOW
Watching the people entering the room, it is obvious that the Turnbull team seems smaller and more resigned than Abbott. On the other hand, Abbott insiders are suggesting they're confident of 45 votes, and Turnbull think they're optimistically lookingIs the A team being conservative (pun intended)? Did I get it wrong? Did the good people on sportsbet get it wrong? Only time can tell.
Phew! I was getting a little concerned in those last few minutes.
ReplyDeleteOh, and reason #4 for my opinion: Julie "Bellwether" Bishop is no fool either. She's remained a very prominent member of every cabinet since the Howard Years. She obviously knew which way the wind was blowing and backed the right horse yet again.