Mayo

Tracey-Lee Cane - Christian Democratic Party (CDP)

Policy Source: As noted above, no online presence for Ms Cane has been identified by myself or the ABC that gives any indication of the candidate's personal views. She is even absent from the party's news updates. The CDP has a lot of policies to pick from, some with a heavy NSW focus, and no obvious method to go about it, except that one policy appears in a pop-up on each page. Policies 2 and 3 were selected based on the length of their discussion on the CDP site. I will add that the CDP policies are perhaps the best set-out and most readable of any policy page I have seen this election, often summarised in a few lines and very reader-friendly.

Policy 1: Marriage, Family and Gender. CDP, unsurprisingly for a conservative Christian party, believes marriage should be between one man and one woman and that "it seems unwise to discard this unique definition of marriage. The party adds that they "are carefully examining the full consequences" of the legalisation of same-sex marriage.

Policy 2: Housing. The CDP blames the current shortage of affordable housing on the abandonment of the government's Housing Commission to "economic rationalist market forces (private developers)" and excessive immigration. To reverse this, the party advocates a review of government charges on development and a return to government-led building rather than renting.

Policy 3: Infrastructure. The party insists infrastructure should be planned to support future generations and describes the access of infrastructure to the elderly and people with disabilities as a "One of the huge imperatives".

Kelsie Harfouche - Australian People's Party (APP)

Policy Source: Ms Harfouche's bio makes specific mention of a bill of rights though I could find no discussion of this idea among the parties' policies. I have taken the three most expansively discussed there as the "main platforms".

Policy 1: Taxation. This party wants to end tax deductions for work expenses*, increase the tax-free threshold, replace tax offsets for carers and people with disabilities with a payment, remove the beneficiary tax offset, reduce marginal tax rates, simplify GST and expand it to financial services, a 20% corporate tax rate with very few possible deductions; tax on all foreign businesses selling to Australians, and a 50% tax on property sales by foreign investors.

Policy 2: Immigration. The APP wants to reduce immigration for a 5-year period by: reducing visa numbers; abolishing temporary skilled migration; relying on temporary protection visas for refugees and repatriating them when it is safe to do so; providing visas for migrants to settle and remain in regional centres for 5 years; deporting all illegal immigrants; requiring family-sponsored immigrants of working age to have full-time employment for 5 years and not rely on welfare payments, with minors to be supported by family sponsors; and requiring immigrants to live here for 5 years, speak English and receive no convictions before seeking citizenship.

Policy 3: Social Security and Living Standards. APP policies call for: a $50 increase in the fortnightly single pension, $90 increase in the couples pension, Reduction of retirement age to 65, a reduction of gas and electricity bills by 50%, the implementation of a gas reservation policy, no expiration dates on any phone/internet data, unemployed people being made to work for councils or the military after 1 year, all welfare recipients to require photo ID, changing the NDIS to the National Investment Scheme, fully fund childcare only for working parents passing a means test, and all businesses with over 100 employees to have in-house childcare.

*The exact wording of this policy is "allow no work-related deductions". Though purely speculative, it is possible this should read "allow non-work-related deductions" which has the opposite effect of expanding rather than restricting tax deductions.

Major Sumner - Greens (GRN)

Policy Source: For the sake of full disclosure, I have met 'Uncle Moogy' previously in my university days and in my industry many people who I work with know him in some capacity. His bio is fertile ground for identifying policy areas he is passionate about, and these are reflected below. Details are taken from the Greens' policy page.

Policy 1: Water. The Greens want legal protections for waterways, a prohibition on large dams, national water testing and research, public ownership of major water systems, increased information on the safety of recycled water, ecologically sound water allocations, the National Water Commission to be reinstated, the return of water to the environment through water-efficient developments and water buyback from agricultural over-allocations, protection of marine mammals and habitats, national approach to dealing with marine pests, recognition and involvement of Indigenous stakeholders, pollution elimination, restrictions on the use of seismic devices, mining techniques and other technologies, including the testing of military and naval explosive devices in the oceans, for resource companies to be fully liable for clean-up costs, and the creation of marine reserves.

Policy 2: First Nations. The party's approach to issues facing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders includes signing treaties with Indigenous groups; governmental policies that respect the need for self-determination of Indigenous groups; protection of cultural and IP rights; equality of outcomes for education, housing, safety and employment; increased resources and access to essential services, particularly in rural and regional Australia; community-based approaches to issues like domestic violence, alcoholism and drug abuse; revoking compulsory income management; compensation for loss of property or withheld wages; effective heritage protection; full support for native title; reduced incarceration rate for Indigenous people and a representative body of First Nations peoples to all levels of Government.

Policy 3: Renewable energy. The Greens want a shift to renewable, clean energy technology and a stronger Renewable Energy Target, 0 net emissions by 2040, orderly phasing out of fossil fuels, binding annual emissions targets, a ban on new coal-fired power stations and fossil fuel extraction and the government vehicle fleet to shift to zero-emissions vehicles.

Georgina Downer - Liberal (LIB)

Policy Source: georginadowner.com has nothing to say on policy, and mostly just redirects to the campaign's Facebook page. This poses a greater than usual difficulty, as I can (and have) extracted three promises from the page's images which is generally an effective way to identify local priorities. I'm not sure that has really identified the key concerns this time around, but the posts on the page are too diverse to select from with any impartial system. In the last week alone there has been a $200,000 investment in the Steamranger Heritage Railway, a promise of $1.2 m for mental health spending in the seat, $4.4 m for a regional sports hub in Mt Barker and 'a strategic traffic planning study' for the Adelaide Hills. I have done the best I can to be impartial and use these three images as per my previous treatment of the major parties, but really the Liberal party needs to put more thought into structuring campaigns to make my election-shaping blog represent them better.

Policy 1: Tax relief. "The tax relief plan will put more money back in the pockets of 58,700 hard-working people living in the Hills, Fleurieu and KI area. Local teachers, nurses, plumbers and police officers earning around $75,000 will save $530 each year. This means a family with two people working will have more than $1000 extra per year to help pay bills or to save some money towards getting ahead."

Policy 2: Mobile coverage. For many rural areas, mobile phone reception isn't just a convenience but can mean life or death in an emergency.

Policy 3: Aquatic Centre. One of the most publicised promises from the Liberals--at least from my perspective as a Mayo resident--has been the Mt Barker Pool upgrade. The contribution is for $10m, or 40% of the projected costs. There really isn't much more detail to add, except that this is separate to the above-mentioned $4.4 m sports hub (which has been criticised as a council and Labor state-funded project the Libs refused to contribute to until recently, but that's another matter).

Also, and this is completely irrelevant to anything electoral, Ms Downer has an IMDb bio for her appearances in interviews. I have not relied on that page for any information, partly because that bio simultaneously claims she was born in Belgium and England.

Rebekha Sharkie - Centre Alliance (CA)

Policy Source: Of the policies laid out on Ms Sharkie's website 8 have links to details. Three of these are sub-points under a broader health policy, two are limited to particular areas in Mayo (duplication of Victor Harbor Road and tax relief for Kangaroo Island) leaving us with the following topics:

Policy 1: Health and Aged Care. Ms Sharkie's ambitions for healthcare in Mayo include a renal dialysis unit in Mount Barker Hospital, a Medicare Service Centre in Victor Harbor, Medicare-rebatable MRIs in both Mount Barker and Victor Harbor and 'Headspace' (a Federal mental health service) to be available along the South Coast. Ms Sharkie also proposes legislation requiring publication of aged-care staff-to-patient ratios covering nurses, clinical nurses, personal care workers, allied health staff and other staff, and wants improved training for personal care workers--at a minimum requiring supervised work experience or placement prior to employment.

Policy 2: The ABC. The candidate wants funding to the ABC to be restored, winding back cuts claimed to date back to 2014.

Policy 3: Live Exports and Processing. Ms Sharkie opposes live exports on animal welfare grounds, but also sees the transition to processed and chilled meat exports as "a real opportunity to grow Australian jobs". The candidate will sign a Bill with multi-party support to encourage the processing of meat within Australia.

Stephen Humble - Liberal Democrats (LDP)

Policy Source: Previously the LDP candidate bios have provided topics for discussion, but Mr Humble's actually sets out his policies in detail. This means the following is presented in a particularly favourable light, smoothing over the more controversial topics of revoking defamation law and widespread privatisation; the following is directly quoted.

Policy 1: Cannabis. "Though it may have initially been well intended and not simply a cynical vote grab through scaremongering, the war on drugs has devolved into misleading propaganda and invasive, costly and harmful actions by government against many people. The war on drugs does not protect people from harm but instead created a whole criminal industry which causes far more harm overall than the drugs themselves would."

Policy 2: Cycling and transport. "Stephen supports repealing bicycle helmet laws and other unjustified or counterproductive and costly intrusions by government into people's individual freedom. Australia's punitive approach of applying fines discourages many people from riding at a time when other countries are supporting increased popularity of bikes, which reduces traffic congestion in cities and makes them more people friendly. Stephen also has an open motorbike license, and values riding. He believes the aim of legislation should be improved efficiency and safety of transport not a means to raise revenue to fill government coffers."

Policy 3: Personal freedoms. "Stephen is opposed to censorship of speech, movies and video games and opposes the imposition of data collection laws which drive up the cost of data services without justification.  He supports equal opportunity rights for all people, legally assisted suicide and is pro-choice.

"Stephen believes that people and the community get the greatest benefit when people are empowered to support themselves and local business rather than more of their money siphoned to Canberra to fund questionable projects. Stephen feels government must be accountable, efficient and benefit the community."

Reginald Coutts - Australian Labor Party (ALP)

Policy Source: Dr Coutts' bio lists telecommunications as an area of expertise for the candidate, but detailed policies on this are hard to find for the ALP. The now standard appeal to images provides a general theme of opposing tax cuts for 'the big end of town' and one banner to 'fix our hospitals' but not enough to form three policy topics. Fortunately, in a post dated June 8, Dr Coutts outlined the areas he believes need particular attention. The selections quoted below are based on the general themes observed above.

Policy 1: Tax cuts and general funding. "The Turnbull Government’s plans for an $80 billion tax cut for big business and an income tax plan that benefits the rich instead of working families are unfair. Meanwhile, they’re cutting funding for services that families, older Australians and young people depend on." "Getting the balance right between road infrastructure and public transport, health and aged-care services, employment opportunities for our young people and affordable housing for them to raise families in, are some of the key issues."

Policy 2: Communications. "l was involved in helping envisage the original National Broadband Network(NBN). This aimed to be a world-best system based on fibre optic cable to 95% of the nation’s households and businesses. It was envisioned to serve our needs into the future and provide the infrastructure that would attract the world’s leading-edge companies to create the jobs of the future in Australia. It’s with a sad heart that I’ve watched this dream turn to disappointment through the implementation of a revised second-rate system. Relying on copper connections for the final link to customers while argued to be cost effective, delivers less reliability, slower speeds, and ultimately higher costs.

"The second-rate NBN isn’t the only telecommunications challenge we face in Mayo. Mobile phone blackspots, variable signal strength and mobile towers not having power backup means we’re particularly vulnerable in emergency situations. Plus, there is legitimate concern when the NBN transfer means loss of the basic telephone line as an emergency lifeline."

Policy 3: Health. In addition to a banner advocating we "fix our hospitals" Dr Coutts points out "It has been Labor governments that have brought us Medicare and the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). I am a strong advocate for the NDIS because I had a severely disabled son who lived a fulfilling life for many years but sadly died a short time ago."

This is the only policy of the three I could find discussed on the ALP website, opposing a calculated $715 m cut to hospitals as well as a link to a site advocating opposition to the claimed privatisation of Medicare by the Liberal party.

Perth

Julie Matheson - Western Australia Party (WAP)

Policy Source: Ms Matheson is the founder of the WAP, and although her bio that the ABC links to does not identify any key policy areas, it is fair to assume that her priorities and the party’s are going to be very closely aligned. A look at the ‘our vision’ page of the WAP website would indicate that this party is entirely concerned with getting WA a larger proportion of GST revenue. Even the ‘read more’ link under the heading ‘policies’ directs to a page titled ‘Truth about the GST’.

Yet the WAP does have other areas it cares, about specifically for the seat of Perth:

I will leave that to serve as a summary of WAP’s policies, trading depth of analysis for quantity, because as previously noted there is not much further detail to give other than on the topic of GST distribution.

Nicole Arielli - Animal Justice Party (AJP)

Policy Source: The AJP is a single-issue party, with all the risks that entails when unrelated legislation is before parliament. At times they have been referred to as extreme, for example in their push for vegetarian or vegan diets. Ms Arielli’s bio includes a statement that she has been “actively educating [her]self on the many animal harm issues including intensive farming, live export, companion animals, testing on animals, greyhound and horse racing, and animals in captivity”. My choice of AJP policy below has been guided by this statement.

Policy 1: Agriculture. The AJP advocates removing all funding from animal farming, a prohibition on advertising animal products, funding farmers to transition to plant-based crops, an end to live export, conscious-animal slaughter, tail docking, animal castration, branding, earmarking, teeth clipping, de-horning and mulesing. As Australians transition to a plant-based diet, the AJP seeks to slowly abolish breeding and rearing for slaughter.

Policy 2: Entertainment. The party seeks to end jumps racing in Victoria and SA and greyhound racing. Recreational hunting, fishing, rodeos, animals in circuses and marine parks, and horse-powered vehicles would also be banned immediately. The party would also phase out funding for zoos that do not exist for the benefit of the animals, favouring conservation parks and sanctuaries.

Policy 3: Companion animals. The AJP’s policy on companion animals is quite expansive in the topics it covers. The party’s desires include: funding for animal rehabilitation and no-kill shelters sufficient to accommodate all unwanted animals, an end to animal sale except from shelters and rescue, breeding by licensed breeders only, subsidising desexing, the abolition of bird cages, and legislation prohibiting landlords from discriminating against pet owners.

Jim Grayden - Independent Liberal (IND)

Policy Source: Mr Grayden is a Liberal-leaning independent candidate, and his website lists six policy areas concisely summarised. Those with “read more option” (two are under construction) all lead to a blog with four news articles, mostly about GST. To further complicate things, several other areas of interest are indicated in his brochures but constrained in detail for reasons of space. The policies below are drawn from the candidate’s policy summaries and blog posts selected based on the frequency related topics are mentioned in the brochure linked to above.

Policy 1: GST Reform. Mr Grayden is seeking “genuine GST reform”, including a minimum return for states of 75c in the dollar and the inclusion of gambling revenues in the GST. In his own words, “The CGC [the commission responsible for GST allocations] says that WA could have poker machines if we wanted to so they deem that WA receives the same revenue per capita that NSW, Victoria, Queensland, ACT and NT get from gambling taxes - the effect is that gambling taxes are effectively left out of the calculations when deciding GST distributions…

“The CGC includes mining royalties in its GST calculations even though the Eastern States have significant mineral resources that they choose not to exploit for political reasons. WA’s is penalised because we don’t have poker machines but the Eastern States are not penalised when they choose not to develop their mineral resources.”

Policy 2: Small Business. “Small business is a major employer and when small business is under stress, jobs suffer. Jobs that our children need whether that is a part-time job while studying or the first step on a career path.

“Jim is very aware of the challenges facing the WA retail sector since the end of the "mining boom" and from emerging online sellers.

“Working in the commercial property sector, Jim knows how business is struggling to survive and the need for real assistance.” [Directly quoted from the candidate’s website]

Policy 3: Resources. Mr Grayden is a “strong supporter” of WA investing in the mining of Lithium and rare earth elements used in modern electronics but notes that less than 1% of the money from lithium-ion batteries returns to WA. He argues that the traditional reasons for processing and manufacture abroad—namely cheaper labour—do not hold up in the modern age of mechanisation and that more of the energy minerals and production industry should be brought to WA.

The candidate also recognises that “as we transition from a fossil-fuel-based economy to a renewable energy based economy sustainability will be more and more important.”

Wesley Du Preez - Liberal Democrats (LDP)

Policy Source: Following my approach adopted for previous LibDem candidates, I have deviated from the ABC's link and policy topics are taken from the LibDem's bio for Wesley Du Preez, which helpfully states three ”simple but ambitious” aims. The former forms one policy below, the latter two. Policy detail is taken from the LibDem policy pages.

Policy 1: Cutting red tape. The party argues for the immediate deregulation of the taxi industry; removal of licensing and certification for various industries including auctioneers, hairdressers, bar workers and casino workers; deregulation of retail trading hours, gambling and poker machines, liquor licensing, radio and television broadcast licensing and workers compensation insurance.

Policy 2: Cutting spending. The party also wants the immediate privatisation of the NBN, ABC, SBS, Australia Post, electricity and public transport, with TAFE, universities, schools and hospitals to follow. With the savings from running such services, the LDP wants the government to have zero net worth in the future, and be funded entirely through taxation rather than borrowing.

Policy 3: Freedoms. The LDP believes in free speech and does not believe defamation, humiliation, intimidation or obscenity should be illegal, but later adds “[w]e should be free from harassment”. They also oppose current restrictions on the extent of media an individual can own and defend the right of journalists to conceal their sources. The LDP opposes the criminalisation of bikie gangs and terrorist organisations on the grounds that there should be freedom of association, along with rejecting curfews, laws against loitering, and limits on peaceful protest. The party also supports the rights to euthanasia, birth control, abortion and the refusal of medical treatment.

Colin Scott - Sustainable Australia (SA)

Policy Source: SA boasts over 20 separate and diverse policy areas on its policy page (24 at the time of writing) but heads this page with a discussion of four major themes: jobs, housing, planning and environment. These four themes are repeated—with specific implications for Perth—in the candidate’s bio. These seat-specific policies are quoted directly below; readers should be aware that the language used may be less neutral and balanced than I try to achieve in my own words.

Policy 1: Secure jobs. For Perth this means:

• Reducing our reliance on housing construction to drive 'growth' and re-allocating much of this 'property investment' speculation back into our factories, farms and small businesses
• Placing a strong emphasis on manufacturing in Perth, rather than importing products, including through helping small business start-ups and high tech robotics
• Better investing in education and skills training (and re-training)

Policy 2: Affordable housing and better planning. For Perth this means:

• Ending all future negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions for property investors
• Restricting the purchase of Australian housing and land to Australian citizens and long-term permanent residents
• Slowing population growth via lower immigration (whilst maintaining our current refugee intake) to save Perth from overdevelopment

…

• Limiting new housing developments to the ability of the local area's infrastructure (schools, hospitals, roads, public transport, parks, gardens, etc) to cope
• Applying more lateral and flexible thinking to improving our public transport network, for example, through bus networks across suburban areas rather than just into the CBD
• Containing our population growth to our ability to affordably and sustainably supply water

Policy 3: Sustainable environment and population. For Perth this means:

• A whole-of-catchment approach to delivering a clean and healthy Swan River
• Curtailing pollution in our living environment, including noise pollution through vehicles and construction
• Strengthening local environmental initiatives including waste recycling, biodiversity and animal habitat protection, soil health, waste recycling and community gardens

Ben Mullings - Australian Mental Health Party (AMHP)

Policy Source: As may be obvious from the party’s name, AMHP is a single issue party and thus it is difficult to predict how they will vote on matters not concerning their focus: mental health. However, the party does provide a page outlining three different policies within the subject of mental health, and these are discussed below.

Policy 1: Medicare. AMHP wants Medicare to be flexible enough to allow people with mental health issues to choose a therapist they trust, and an end to the inconsistent and often abruptly terminating support for therapy.

Policy 2: Education. The party wishes to adjust the curriculum in schools to encourage understanding of mental health issues and to improve cognitive, emotional, and interpersonal functioning among young people to minimise help manage the emergence and severity of mental health issues later in life.

Policy 3: Mental Health Targets. AMHP seeks to establish targets for suicide reduction, mental health funding, housing for people in need and other areas that the party believes will limit the severity of Australia’s mental health crisis.

Patrick Gorman - Labor Party (ALP)

Policy Source: As above for the larger parties with well-oiled social media machines I have inspected the images posted to summarise Mr Gorman’s priorities. Further details, where available, are provided from the national ALP campaigns page.

Policy 1: Education. Posts by the candidate indicate strong support for “properly funding schools”, and the ALP promise of waiving fees for 100,000 TAFE places. Federally the party also opposes cuts to university spending, increases to university fees and student debt, cuts to schools, $3b in funding cuts to TAFE.

Policy 2: Taxes and Wages. Mr Gorman’s images state he will fight for WA to receive a larger proportion of GST funding, reverse the cut to penalty rates, and support tax cuts for 70,000 WA workers rather than corporate tax cuts. The party generally also has issues with the overuse of labour-hire workers rather than employees.

Policy 3: Funding services. The ALP seeks to preserve funding for public services it sees as under threat from the Liberal government, including Medicare, the ABC and the SBS. The funding of the ABC has been one of many key issues in Mr Gorman’s campaign, along with providing a better NBN with less downtime and faster repairs, funding for local infrastructure including Gateway WA, and a promise to invest $2.8b in hospitals compared to a $7.8m cut to Perth Hospital and a $77m cut to hospitals across WA blamed on the current federal government. The ALP calculates federal funding to hospitals nationally between 2017 and 2020 will amount to $715m and opposes these cuts.

Gabriel Harfouche - Australian People's Party (APP)

Policy Source: Mr Reece’s bio gives me no direction on his personal issues of interest but party's policy page has several policies to sort through, so I have taken the three most expansively discussed as the "main platforms".

Policy 1: Taxation. This party wants to end tax deductions for work expenses*, increase the tax-free threshold, replace tax offsets for carers and people with disabilities with a payment, remove the beneficiary tax offset, reduce marginal tax rates, simplify GST and expand it to financial services, a 20% corporate tax rate with very few possible deductions; tax on all foreign businesses selling to Australians, and a 50% tax on property sales by foreign investors.

Policy 2: Immigration. The APP wants to reduce immigration for a 5-year period by: reducing visa numbers; abolishing temporary skilled migration; relying on temporary protection visas for refugees and repatriating them when it is safe to do so; providing visas for migrants to settle and remain in regional centres for 5 years; deporting all illegal immigrants; requiring family-sponsored immigrants of working age to have full-time employment for 5 years and not rely on welfare payments, with minors to be supported by family sponsors; and requiring immigrants to live here for 5 years, speak English and receive no convictions before seeking citizenship.

Policy 3: Social Security and Living Standards. APP policies call for: a $50 increase in the fortnightly single pension, $90 increase in the couples pension, Reduction of retirement age to 65, a reduction of gas and electricity bills by 50%, the implementation of a gas reservation policy, no expiration dates on any phone/internet data, unemployed people being made to work for councils or the military after 1 year, all welfare recipients to require photo ID, changing the NDIS to the National Investment Scheme, fully fund childcare only for working parents passing a means test, and all businesses with over 100 employees to have in-house childcare.

*The exact wording of this policy is "allow no work-related deductions". Though purely speculative, it is possible this should read "allow non-work-related deductions" which has the opposite effect of expanding rather than restricting tax deductions.

Paul Collins - Independent (IND)

Policy Source: Mr Collins is positioning himself as the closest thing Perth has to a Liberal candidate this election, but although he is a member of the Liberal party he has also stated he does not agree with them on everything. As such, I am not relying on the Liberal party policies for this write-up. In his posts on Facebook I can find a lot of ALP positions Mr Collins opposes, but few direct positions he will argue for except a 75c floor on GST returns to WA. There are some policies, however in the brochure shown below, so I will do the usual lazy shortcut of posting that instead of writing them up under three headings. Be aware that as this is written by (or at least for) the candidate, it may not be impartially worded.

Caroline Perks - The Greens (GRN)

Policy Source: Conveniently, the Greens have released specific policies for the WA by-elections in Fremantle and Perth. There are three policies from their general platform--'Ending Corporate Influence', 'World Class Social Services' and 'A Future For All Of Us'--and two other policies specifically released during WA by-election season--'Beyond Waste' and 'Getting Big Money Out Of Politics'. The latter are used as main policies below. Ignoring 'Ending Corporate Influence' as being synonymous with 'Getting Big Money Out Of Politics', the other two policies 'World Class Social Services' and 'A Future For All Of Us' are discussed as the third policy for Perth and Freemantle respectively, decided by a coin flip. Voters in either seat would do well to read both summaries.

Policy 1: Beyond Waste. The Greens' waste management policy is set out over four steps: investment in resource recovery (i.e. recycling) initiatives including through community grants, ending federal funding for waste incineration, phasing out single-use plastic products and introducing mandatory schemes to encourage the manufacture of recyclable products.

Policy 2: Getting Big Money Out Of Politics. The Greens' plan to limit the monetary influence of politicians is two-pronged: first by introducing a $30 carbon price on major polluters and removing fossil fuel subsidies which they argue encourage pollution thanks to the influence of the fossil fuel lobby, and secondly by banning political donations from mining, development, tobacco and alcohol industries, capping all other donations and demanding all donations over $1000 are reported to the public. Their ending corporate influence policy also mentions making corporations pay their 'fair share' of tax, opposing a corporate tax cut from 30% to 25%, and establishing a government-backed People’s Bank.

Policy 3: World Class Services. The first sentence of this policy page is: “The Greens are a party of essential services, not tax cuts”. These services include a $75 increase to the Newstart and Youth Allowance; more funding for primary, secondary and tertiary education; improvements to public health care; fully funding the NDIS; adding dental to Medicare; increasing access to bulk-billing GPs; further investment in mental health; providing accessible and affordable public transport.

Aaron Hammond - Science Party (SCI)

Policy Source: I was not easily able to determine a method of prioritising the policies of the Science Party (which covers a lot of topics) on either Mr Hammond’s Facebook or the party website, although Mr Hammond’s how to vote card does provide the small panel of policies below—a little lighter on detail than I prefer but a convenient summary.

Ellen Joubert- Australian Christians (AC)

Policy Source: There are 9 policy areas listed on the party's website with no obvious way to pick the main ones, but most can be folded into their broadest policy heading of 'Social Policies'. Three others remain: 'Environment and Climate' and 'Economy' which are long enough to deserve description below and their 'Religious Freedom' policy which is summarised in this one-page document they provide.

Policy 1: Social Policies. On the topic of family, the AC believes marriage should be between a man and a woman and supports adoption only by heterosexual couples, mentoring programs for men and boys without fathers, pre-marriage education for all couples, perjury laws to be applied to the Family Court, declassifying 'economic abuse' as a criminal offence. They oppose the introduction of voluntary euthanasia, abortion and IVF outside of heterosexual marriage. The party opposes the Safe Schools program, wants the national curriculum to be developed by stakeholders and supports the inclusion of Australia’s Christian heritage in the curriculum. It supports medical uses of cannabis but not recreational use. They oppose the inclusion of home ownership in the means testing of pensions, wants pensions to be indexed by a measure other than CPI and supports fully funding the NDIS. The party opposes prostitution but believes punishment should fall on the clients of sex workers rather than sex workers themselves, and ISP filters on pornographic material by default in Australia.

Policy 2: Environment and Climate. This party does not believe there is sufficient evidence for human-caused climate change and opposes any form of taxation or other burdens to this end, but supports "sensible pollution controls that do not unnecessarily and excessively burden businesses and increase the cost of living". This position heads all of their policies on the environment, be that generally, carbon taxation specifically, and even water management. These policies then all provide the '10 key aims' of their subsequent policies: recognition of pollution harms and adapting [sic] evidence-based solutions; land use management geared towards environmental sustainability; protecting natural biodiversity; ensuring air and water quality; managing vegetation and soil quality for agricultural sustainability; improving waste management; protecting coasts and rivers; ensuring sustainable resource development; balanced and sustainable consumption; promoting energy and resource production without favour to any approach.

Policy 3: Economy. The AC opposes keeping the minimum wage as high as it currently is, increasing taxes on businesses or implementing greater employment regulation (particularly in child care). They support income splitting for single-income families and the establishment of specialist banks for small and medium businesses.

Tony Robinson - Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA)

Policy Source: Mr Robinson is a co-founder of ALA, and on the party’s own statement that he would be contesting the seat of Perth it states that voting for the candidate will “show the corrupt career politicians that we have had enough of BIG government, BIG government waste, Islamisation and divisive multiculturalism”. The following policy areas are derived from this statement and filled with detail from the party’s policy page.

Policy 1: Small Government. The ALA seeks less bureaucracy and the reduction in government spending to below 20% of GDP. To do this, the ALA will push for a reduction in the number of ministers to only the positions they consider essential, reduce government overheads, and end government programs they determine to be wasteful.

Policy 2: Islam. The party views Islam as a totalitarian ideology that does not accept the separation of church and state. The party opposes all attempts to impose Sharia law on Australia “before the demographic, economic and sociopolitical realities make a peaceful solution impossible”, which presumably includes voluntary Sharia courts as used in the UK. Achieving this includes a 10-year ban on immigration from member nations of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (excepting non-Muslim refugees). Halal foods should be labelled according to the ALA, and certified at the producer’s cost and full-face coverings prohibited in public.

Policy 3: Multiculturalism. The ALA opposes the existence of dual citizenship, opposes affirmative action, and sees reconciliation with Aboriginal Australians as incompatible with the treatment of Indigenous people as a special class of citizens.

At first glance, it might make more sense to divide the three policy areas into small government, spending and multiculturalism including Islam, but the division of policies on the website makes it easier to disentangle island and multiculturalism generally rather than government size and spending.

Ian Britza - Independent (IND)

Policy Source: Mr Britza is surprisingly hard to track down, given that he has previously served in Liberal governments before leaving the party. I could find no website or policy discussion and no pamphlet in his name except this one from his time in the Liberal party with no real policy information. I did find a newspaper article that listed his priorities as GST, senior Australians and government accountability, but I don’t have any information to expand upon this. His Facebook page did not help much either but did provide me with a media release. While I can’t extract specific promises from this, here are two quoted segments that may give voters some idea of his priorities:

“Ian has said ‘Australian People are wanting to regain the ability to get ahead, see real reduction in the cost of living and the cost of doing business in Australia. People want fair and affordable access to quality health, education and essential services as well as being confident in their safety.’ Ian is committed to standing up for these issues regardless of a win or lose.”

…

“Lack of the Australian Tax and importation laws is seeing an unprecedented amount of small and family businesses fail and close. Again, bipartisan inaction by both parties is the main reason this is occurring, despite both their bureaucracy and Politicians being provided proof of what is going on. Australian Jobs are another area Ian is committed to fighting for in Canberra.”

Barry Mason - Citizens Electoral Council (CEC)

Policy Source: The CEC is a LaRouche-ian party that has not noticeably updated its site in the decade or so of my reporting on elections, so some information may be drastically out of date. Mr Mason’s priorities are set out in the opening paragraph of his bio: “‘Jail bankers for fraud; break up the corrupt and bankrupt banks and then generate cheap credit for productive industries and infrastructure by establishing a government-owned National bank.’ These are just a few of the key policies that Barry Mason your Citizens Electoral Council (CEC) candidate for the Perth by-election, says he will fight for when elected.” That is technically three promises, however I feel realistically these should be treated as one topic. There is also discussion of international relations, but no real detail can be found on this on the CEC’s policy page. This page is headed by three topics too: survival, recovery and prosperity. Again, the first two are banking-reform focussed. The third discusses infrastructure and forms a second point to discuss below. Of the topics listed below that as ‘policy initiatives’ three remain distinct from these two topics: electoral reform, food crisis and global warming being a hoax. Of these, I feel the latter is the most newsworthy.

Policy 1: Banking reform. In addition to imprisoning bankers, dismantling banks and establishing a federal bank, the party insists on ‘Glass-Steagall’ separation of commercial and investment banking, the restoration of trade tariffs as part of the ‘New Bretton Woods’ system and the freezing of all home and banking mortgages until the CEC determines the GFC to have passed (this last decade apparently still being one of depression worse than the 1930s according to the CEC site).

Policy 2: Industry and Infrastructure. Perhaps one of the most strikingly specific policy text on the CEC website is: “We Must Have a National Fertilizer Industry!”, in response to the previously mentioned perceived food crisis. This includes government regulation of fertiliser prices at 2006 levels, a Fertilizer Control and Development Board, outlawing Anglo-Dutch cartel involvement in Australian agriculture and establishing rail infrastructure. The party also wants nationalisation of oil, gas and raw materials industries, support for the pig, sheep and dairy industries, the end of Murray-Darling environmental flows and at least 18 water developments in the forms of dams, irrigation structures and so forth. Rail development around the nation, high-speed shipping, a moon/mars program and thorium nuclear energy are all proposed by the CEC

Policy 3: Global Warming. The CEC claims that “Man-made global warming is a fraud”. What follows in this policy can only be described as a conspiracy theory (I leave the reader to determine whether the recent pejorative connotations of the term apply) that involves Al Gore, the World Wildlife Fund, Thomas Malthus (on behalf of the British East India Company) and H.G. Wells to (and I am quoting here to avoid an appearance of exaggeration) “shut down farming, manufacturing and energy industries, and kill millions of people” while introducing “a world government (akin to Tim Flannery’s proposed Commission for Thermostatic Control)”.

I genuinely have no idea where to begin discussing this, so I won’t.

The good, the bad, the nitty-gritty, the legislative council and the Dark Knight.

We actually have four elections to recap--one predicted well, one poorly and two I didn't touch. First up:

TASMANIA

Not a huge amount to say here. These were my predictions:

These were the actual results:

The areas I got right really don't leave me much to talk about. They fell the way I said they would, presumably for the reasons I said they would. The only incorrect call is the final seat in Bass. The prediction for this was that the Greens would lead the 4-way race for this last seat. In quote fractions, this was incorrect as follows:

ALP: 0.58
GRN: 0.56

LIB: 0.53
JLN: 0.28

As such, my flow-on predictions did not work out. I did provide a short summary of what might happen if the ALP was ahead at this point, but it was basically a mess depending on who dropped out next and how JLN preferences distributed. At a basic level, though, my prediction failed because I assumed ALP would get 1Q+N votes and the greens M where Q is a full quota, and N < M < Q. in actual fact N > M by a very thin margin--an error of 297 first-preference votes in a seat with almost 65,000 formal ballots. That's pretty darn close to getting 100% on my predictions.

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

A somewhat less pleasing prediction result here, but one that I will break down into specific areas I did well in to soothe my wounded ego. While there may be a little counting to go in some seats, the results look reasonably clear:

That is 36 correct out of 47 or less than 77%. Not great. But there is some silver (or, at least, grey) lining. Normally the independents are hard to predict: they can come and go without warning, with no regular polling available and campaigns limited to individual seats making them very hard to research. Yet of the 15 lower house independent candidates, and with five seats previously held by independents, I managed to predict every single one. That's something of an accomplishment.

Additionally, and now famously, Xenophon's SA-Best party dramatically underperformed compared to expectations. On the numbers, I had 7 seats going to SA-Best but I did also say

My gut says SA-Best might get 3 seats at most, and the others go to the Libs

 I had no statistical basis for this, so didn't bother to specify which of the seven I would give to the Libs; that said, the Liberal party won every one of the SAB-predicted seats so it wouldn't have mattered. Going on my assumption four of those would be won by the Libs raises my hit rate to 40/47 or a respectable 85%. If my prediction that any possible SAB seat lost would be picked up by the Liberals was extended to all seven seats for a standard 2-party dominated election I would have scored 43/47 or 91%.

The other four are Adelaide, Giles, King and Mawson. Two were predicted for Labor and won by the Liberals, and the other two predicted for the Liberals and won by Labor. As a result, my prediction without SA-Best would have been ALP 19: LIB 25: IND 3--the actual result. That's a (rather fudged) 100%. Then again a recount in Adelaide is looking like it might actually pass to the ALP and if so: "Yay! Another seat right!" but also "There goes my post-hoc 100%"

So despite the rather poor result this election, in a race without Xenophon (assuming that did not shift preference flows etc), this would have been a solid result.

Thanks, Obama! Nick!

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

So I didn't make any predictions for the LegCo due to time constraints. That said, I think it's worth checking in on since I actually prefer voting for upper houses where there is a diversity of great and not-at-all-great candidates to balance.

Newspoll had the vote split as follows 2 days before the election: ALP 31: LIB 34: SAB 17: GRN 8: Other 10 (I am ignoring the ReachTEL poll of the same day since it only considered ALP, LIB and SAB with no GRN or Others). There were 11 seats to fill, and they need to reach the Droop Quota: that's (Total votes/( Seats+1))+1 or just over 1/12th (8.333%) of the vote in this case. So logically you'd expect ALP to win 3, LIB to win 4, SAB to win 2, with the last two up for grabs. GRN are a rounding error away from getting one too. So We could have predicted ALP 3: LIB 4: SAB 2: GRN 1. There is 10 sitting with the Others, but they are too diverse to likely scratch a seat together and it would be impossible to pick which party to give it to (possibly Dignity, based on their past election). Alternatively, The residual votes after the assigned Quotas would look something like ALP 6: LIB 0.333: SAB 0.333. The chance of far left and far right minor parties cooperating enough to outperform the ALP at that stage would have been unthinkable given the absence of preference tickets in modern voting. So the final prediction (postdiction?) would have to be ALP 4: LIB 4: SAB 2: GRN 1.

And that's exactly what the results came out as.

HOLY BY-ELECTION, BATMAN!

And lastly, of course, I did not make a prediction for the much-discussed Batman by-election which gripped most of the nation while SA was voting locally. I didn't even have time to predict the SA LegCo, so what do you expect?

The 2016 election had the ALP hold off the greens with 51% of the vote, 2-party preferred. Polling from February was predicting an ALP win of 53%, the only poll on the by-election's Wikipedia page. Off of that, I should have suspected the ALP would hold the seat, but many commentators were predicting a Greens victory. As a result, Labor's eventual victory is being hailed as a terrible loss for the Greens, but I don't see it that way at all.

There was a recorded swing to the ALP. But then the Liberal party didn't even run, and I don't see those voters (some of whom may have lingered briefly with the conservatives or other minor parties) flowing to the Greens very much. Then again, their eventual landing with the ALP would have happened after the Libs dropped out in 2016. So, yes, there was a swing against the Greens. On the other hand, the Greens still picked up almost 40% of the primary vote. That's not a bad result for a party often left in distant third place.

Staying in the lines

Been a while since I did one of these, but here is the old map-and-chart combo for those playing along at home during the election broadcast. Colour pencils not included.

SA-Best Guesses

Alright, it's election day tomorrow. We all know why we're here. Let's do some number crunching.

First up, here is the pendulum after the last boundary redistribution:

This redistribution put four Labor-held seats (Colton, Elder, Mawson and Newland) into the nominally Liberal range. Seats italicised are those that will deserve special consideration later on, either because the incumbent does not match the nominal 2-party margin (the four previous seats and those held by independents) or because they are on The Poll Bludger's list of possible wins for SA-Best. Two by-elections in SA (in the seats of Fisher and Davenport) also mean that applying the swing from 2014 (rather than the by-election year) may be flawed. Davenport already deserves special consideration as a possible SA-Best win; Fisher is no longer a seat. So let's just apply the predicted swing across the board to get us started.

A Swing and a Prayer

The interesting thing about this election is that, compared to 2014, both Labor and Liberal have reduced their primary vote (down 5.8 and 12.8 percentage points respectively, according to Newspoll). This is largely due to the rise of SA-Best--indeed polls have stopped publishing 2 party preferred data.

So in all non-italicised seats (where SA-Best is unlikely to win, and preferences will flow as normal), I have applied a slight swing calculated as follows:

In 2014 the 2pp vote was 47% ALP: 53% LIB
Xenophon votes generally split roughly 60:40 to the Liberals (Source: p.7)
Numbers on Greens votes are harder to find, but lets assume 90:10 to the ALP
'Others' are ignored as unpredictable
Using these ratios the latest polling of: ALP 30; LIB 32; SAB 21; GRN 7
Becomes: ALP 44.3; LIB 45.3
adjusted to sum to 100, this is rounded to: 49:51
And this equates to a 2% swing to the ALP

Applied to all 2-party contests the pendulum then looks something like:

Interestingly, this slight shift to the ALP is nowhere near enough to bring the four re-drawn seats that shifted to the Liberals back to Labor, nor does it change any seat except that it brought the surprise 2010 Lib win in Adelaide back to a tossup. Then again, the margin of error on these polls is around 2 to 3 percentage points, which would put Black and Gibson in doubt too. Let's add them to the list in need of review:

Adelaide, Black, Chaffey, Colton, Davenport, Elder, Finniss, Florey, Frome, Gibson, Giles, Hammond, Hartley, Heysen, Kavel, Mawson, Morialta, Morphett, Mt Gambier, Narungga, Newland, Stuart and Waite.

Holy Pebble-counters, that's a lot!

To have 23 uncertain seats from 47 (literally just under 50%) at this stage is a record for me. Let's look at the independents first:

Florey: Florey is a safe ALP seat on the numbers and by history. The current incumbent, Frances Bedford, was an ALP member until she became an independent last year. The biggest challenge to an independent is getting enough name recognition to beat the major parties, and sometimes being an incumbent is not enough. In Bedford's case, this hurdle appears to have been mounted; a poll in 2017 had her primary vote ahead of the ALP, and I suspect this has only grown with the exodus of support from the major parties.
Predict: IND

Frome: In 2014, Geoff Brock's primary vote almost out-polled Liberals and Labor combined; again, the hurdle of recognition has been beaten, although there may be some backlash against the candidate in the conservative seat for working with Labor.
Predict: IND


Morphet: Duncan McFetridge has had an unfortunate run of luck, first losing his shadow ministry, then losing preselection to run as a Liberal. As a sitting MP, he will have some traction but it will be an uphill battle to keep this staunch Liberal seat:
Predict: LIB

Mt Gambier: Despite controversy surrounding the financial actions of former-Liberal, independent incumbent Troy Bell, there was polling about a month back showing he would easily win the seat and I don't expect this to have changed. This seat was also listed as a potential Xenophon win, but this has been accounted for in the polls.
Predict: IND

Waite: Safe liberal seat, former Liberal leader Martin Hamilton-Smith became an independent shortly after the last election and notoriously assisted the ALP as a minister this term. Some retribution is to be expected here. This seat has also been singled out as a strong chance for SA-Best. Support for Xenophon in the seat during the federal election was around 23.5%, This is less than the primary vote for the ALP in 2014, though no doubt some of that will be eroded to SA-Best. It is therefore likely that SA-Best will beat the ALP, inherit a lot of preferences and may have a shot at Waite. I will tentatively give this seat to SA-Best, though a Liberal victory would not be surprising. My expectations are the Hamilton-Smith preferences will back SA-Best too, as conservatives disillusioned with the Liberal party, but we will have to wait (or Waite) and see...
Predict: SAB

Next, let's look at the other seats where SAB might do well. There are 13 of these, and support for SA-Best is hard to measure from the polling due to their new arrival in the stats. My back-of-the-envelope methods, then, are this:

The federal election was held in July 2016. At that time state polling included SAB support at 16pp. Federal results in these seats were over 23%. Since then, SAB primary vote statewide has improved by 5, or 31%. To be conservative, we will add a flat 5pp to the federal results (by which The Poll Bludger identified these as hot SAB seats) and compare that to the pendulum (ignoring the Davenport by-election) adjusted by the recent polling for the rise of SA-Best (ALP x83.8%; LIB x71.4%).

The test here is to see whether SA-Best can beat at least one major party so it can collect the flow-on preferences. The answer is yes in the case of Chaffey, Finniss, Hammond, Heysen and Kavel (parts of federal Mayo, which elected Xenophon's only lower house candidate in 2016) and Stuart. I will tentatively give these to SA-Best and the others to the major parties. Interestingly, this means Xenophon's own seat of Hartley is given to the LIBs.

Adelaide, Black, Colton and Elder. Just quickly: Adelaide has a strong ALP history; Paul Caica has held Colton since 2002, when Labor first got in, but his primary vote margin over the Libs was 0.1% and 3% 2pp--with the dropping of Labor's popularity and a tough redistribution I'm calling this LIB; Elder has been ALP since 1997, but the redistribution was rough--nominally LIB; Black used to be Mitchell which was all over the place historically so dart-at-a-dartboard this is LIB too.

Final Prediction:

 

ALP 19; LIB 18; SA-Best 7; IND 3. That's by the numbers, at least. My gut says SA-Best might get 3 seats at most, and the others go to the Libs giving them 22. I also feel the Indpendents and Xenophon will back the Libs to form minority government either way.

SA Election Candidates 2018

Receipt of postal votes for the Tasmanian Legislative Assembly election closed yesterday so we will have to press on with the SA election before we get any closure on what happened down south. That said, the results so far look VERY good for our predictions so far--at last check 22 correct, 0 incorrect and 3 undecided.


A prediction of the results for SA will, of course, follow soon, but while we wait for the latest possible polling data I will go a little further than usual for my home state and give a brief summary of the parties standing in the festival state for those without the time, inclination or patience to wade through pages and pages of platitudes and political waffle. That said, it is not possible to succinctly summarise a party position, and doing your own research is always valuable.

I always try to give a somewhat impartial summary in these cases, but I have to be selective for reasons of space if nothing else. As a result, this year I am confining myself to the key points set out on each website as the key promises, and a summary of the main criticism I have read or heard for each party. I will start with the Legislative Council since most lower house candidates will be captured in this summary too.

Legislative Council (Upper House)

How to Vote: There are two ways to vote for the South Australian Legislative Council: above- or below-the-line.

To vote above-the-line, simply place a '1' in the box of your preferred party. You may number additional parties '2', '3' etc. Your vote will extinguish (cease to be counted) once it runs out of numbered boxes. The advantage of above-the-line voting is that it is quicker and easier.

To vote below-the-line, place the numbers '1' to '12' next to the candidates of your choice. You may number additional candidates from '13' onwards. Your vote will extinguish (cease to be counted) once it runs out of numbered boxes. The advantage of below-the-line voting is greater control over your vote's distribution, and you can vote for independents in the 'ungrouped' column.

If you wish to take in a sample ballot as a 'cheat sheet' with your preferences already filled out, the electoral commission provides one here you can print.

Party A: Stop Population Growth Now (SPGN)

Policy Website: http://www.stoppopulationgrowthnow.com/electionpolicies.html
Policy Highlights: SPGN is largely a single-party issue. While their concerns regarding population growth range from environmental to economic to health to infrastructure, there is no easy way to divide these issues up and they are all resolved by a single policy: limit and, if necessary, reduce the population. As the party's website itself states "SPGN has chosen not to formulate detailed statements covering individual areas of public policy such as health, education, defence, energy, finance, etc."
Criticism: The main criticism, apart from being a single issue party and thus potentially unpredictable on votes for matters not touching on population, is that population growth is good for the state, the nation, the economy and so forth. Essentially, a larger workforce provides more goods and services to a larger market of consumers and provides more tax revenue to support schools, hospitals, pensions etc. SPGN summarises many of these arguments themselves (with rebuttals) here.

Party B: The Greens (GRN)

Policy Website: https://greens.org.au/policies/sa
Policy Highlights: Protecting The Environment; Putting Essential Services Back In Public Hands; A Fairer Future For All (Source: 'Our Vision')
Protecting the Environment: The environmentalist side of the Greens party is well known, and is probably their defining characteristic in the public consciousness. The Greens support more renewable energy, protecting at-risk environmental areas, opposes coal-seam gas mining and--even more strongly--underground coal gassification, opposes nuclear power, reduce waste and tackle climate change.
Essential Services: The Greens push for greater and cheaper access to reliable internet as a crucial part of the future of australian lifestyles; provide greater funding to firefighting services; increase funding to community legal centres; provide more, free and government run childcare; make renewable (solar) energy available to retners and remote areas, and put greater regulation of power companies to control power prices; and implement various measures to imporve SA's water security.
Fairer Future: The Greens famously support assisted dying/euthanasia with appropriate safeguards. Perhaps less well known are their views that a government-run energy retailer is needed to combat price rises from private companies, voluntary voting in state and council elections should be possible from 16 years of age, industrial manslaughter should exist as a criminal offence to hold companies--not just negligent individuals--responsible for workplace deaths, and MPs should be prohibited from having second jobs. Additionally they want to improve minimum employemt standards for trainees, ensure a fair minimum wage and strenghten measures to stop workplace discrimination or bullying.
Criticism: The most common agrument against the Greens in my experience is that they are left-leaning hippies only concerned with protecting the environment and no real policies. Simple examination of the facts will reveal the Greens have a far wider policy platform and many solid, specific aims (whether one agrees with them or not). The most common vaguely-defensible arguement against voting for the Greens tends to be that they are a highly-activist party more concerned with pushing an agenda of no-nuclear power, renewable energy and so forth without looking at all of the data available--and occasionally relying on conspiracy theories about fossil-fuel bilionaires controlling the government to make renewable energy a universal skapegoat.

Party C: Dignity Party Inc (DIG)

Policy Website: https://dignityparty.org.au/policies/
Policy Highlights: Education; NDIS (Source: no concise 'short list' available, but these two issues are the only categories available on their 'Bulletin' page. I have also added disability support as a third point, since this is the core of their platform.)
Education: Dignity believes there is a need to alter public perceptions about people with disabilities, and promote the many ways people with disabilities can and do contribute to society.
NDIS: Dignity is in favour of the NDIS and extending its services, but I could not find any specific policies on this.
Disability Support: A major theme of the party's policy platofrm beond just the NDIS, Dignity pushes for all new buildings to be accessable to people with disabilities; improvements to access to employment, public transport, education, accomodation and other services; and better targetting concessions and services for low-income and people with disabilities.
Criticism: The major criticism of the Dignity party is not one unique to them: as a single-issue or predominantly single-issue party, there is some uncertainty as to how the party will vote on issues not touched by their core platform. Additionally, a focus on one issue, however serious and mimportant, may see other priorities neglected by the parliament.

Party D: Nick Xenophon's SA-Best (SAB)

Policy Website: https://sabest.org.au/state-policies/
Policy Highlights: Responsible, Transparent & Accountable Government; Taking Back Control of our Essential Services; Cut Waste and Re-Direct Resources into Health and Communities; Revitalise our Economy and give our Kids a Future (Source: 'Our Focus')
Responsible Government: Xenophon wants to reduce the number of MPs, Ministers and portfolios, make FOI requests easier, stronger watchdog orgnaisations and protections for whistleblowers, and introduce a wide range of restrictions on local governments while making their actions more transparent.
Essential Services: SA-Best promises to strengthen control over power prices and ensure electricity is reliable and affordable for South Australians, provide a rebate on the Emergency Services Levy for active volunteers, Reduce the ESL, and improve telephone infrastructure and coverage for remote areas to assist in emergency situations.
Health and Communities: Obviously part of thisfunting to health and communities  has to be SA-Best's position on poker machines. The party wants to put poker machines on a seven-year liscence to give small venues time to transition, then gradually phase the machines out, along with restrictions on bets, jackpots, availability of EFTPOS and the like to cut down on the amount that can be spent. Other policies include an investigation of the gender pay gap; a royal comission into the current health sector's issues; restoring hospitals, including rural hospitals, departments and services, including for mental health and paliative care, to move away from a recent centralisation of services in Adelaide; mandatory rehab for ice abuse;
Economy and Future: This party intends to give financial, practical and regulatory support to schools, parents, teachers and students to maximise the state's educational outcomes, oposses deregulation of trading hours to ensure a better deal for employees and small businesses, and encourages investment in rural and metropolitan SA.
Criticism: Perhaps because SA-Best poses a significant threat to both major parties, a lot of negative campaigns against SA-Best have been aired. A lot of these criticisms are centred around previous actions taken by Xenophon and his parties, and many are directly rebutted by the party here. More generally there is an argument that a vote for SA-Best is a vote for either Labor or the Liberals, depending on whom you ask.

Party E: Liberal Democrats (LDP)

Policy Website: https://www.ldp.org.au/policy
Policy Highlights: Liberty; Prosperity (Source: 'Policy')
Liberty: The LibDems are a libertarian party; as such they oppose the criminalisation of "victimless crimes" including marijuana use, euthanasia, not wearing a bike helmet, willing prostitution, early-term abortion, etc. The party also supports a shift to voluntary voting and enrolment, citizen-initiated referenda and greater decentralisation of federal power to the states. The party also supports minimal restrictions of gun ownership, cutting of government support that encourages university students to study, supports freedom of speech and religion (including freedom to wear religious garments), allow motorcycles to use bus lanes and a review of speed limits.
Prosperity: The LibDem view of prosperity is one of free trade, privatisation of all non-essential holdings (including privitisation of hospitals, ABC, SBS, NBN, Australia Post, electricity generation, public transport, TAFE, universities and schools), a government without debt or surplus, making bank-bail-outs illegal, 0% inflation, an end to foreign aid, and nn end to minimum wage and conditions.

Criticism: Libertarians occupy an uncomfortable middleground, with left-wing social policies and right-wing economic policies (the liberty and prosperity arms of policy respectively). The criticisms, therefore, come from two directions. more conservative votors tend to see the decriminalisation of drug use, prostitution, abortion, eithanasia etc. as eroding social values and morals (and, among extreme comentators, as a form of genocide). Progressive critics tend to cite the disadvanteages particularly to poor or otherwise underprivelidged groups due to the risk of exploitation from unregulated employers and predatory behaviours from necessary services like private hospitals and educational institutions.

Party F: Advance SA (ASAP)

Policy Website: https://www.advancesaparty.com.au/policies 
Policy Highlights: honesty, good judgement and fairness (Source: no concise 'short list' available, but these guiding principles are laid out as the standards against which the party will measure all decisions under their 'About' page)
Honesty: ASAP wants an audit of all government functions and services to identify areas for cuts or additional funding,
Good Judgement: The Advance SA Party wants hospital waiting lists to be made public to improve accountability, wants an education onbudsman to investigate complaints about schools, and wants control of hospitals decentralised to hospital boards to avoid government intervention and beareaucracy.
Fairness: ASAP wishes to remove the statute of limitations of child abuse which requires actions to be brought by the age of 21, provide greater protections for both tennants and landlords, and supports voluntary euthanasia.
Criticism: Advance SA has a MLC in parliament currently, John Darley, but is reasonably unknown due to Darley having been part of the Xenophon party when he was elected. As a result there is little public criticism of this party, except that Darley seperated from Xenophon due to the former's support for Labor's reforms to the legislative council.

Party G: Animal Justice Party (AJP)

Policy Website: https://animaljusticeparty.org/policies/
Policy Highlights: Animals; Humans; Environment (Source: 'Policies'. This party also promotes the trifecta of 'Kinder * Greener * Fairer' on its South Australian page, but this is harder to divide policies between.)
Animals: The AJP advocates an end of funding for animal farming or product development and for research including animal experimentation. The AJP also opposes the use of animals in entertainment contrary to their welfare, including greyhound racing, jumps racing, recreational hunting, game fishing, rodeos, horse-drawn carriage rides, circusses, marine theme parks and zoos where the focus is on human experience rather than animal welfare as might be the case in sanctuaries and conservation parks. The party also has a list of desired regulations on pet ownership and policies regarding various native and introduced species sepcifically.
Humans: This party seeks to limit population growth, consolidate health funding at the state level to increase accountability and reduce excessive use of drugs that may lead to resistant diseases emerging. The AJP has many other policies viewed  almost obstinately from an animal perspective: Their economic/employment policies revolves around closing animal industries and reskilling those workers, thoush also advocates carers' leave bein extended to care for companion animals and encouraging wildlife tourism; Their education policy includes education about/involving animals and vegan dining options in higher education; their health and mental health platforms are largely focussed on phasing out traumatic animal industries, plant-bsed diets and animal use in therapy; and their domestic violence policy contains only one point requiring shelters to allow pets.
Environment: The AJP supports clean energy, opposes fossil fuels and natural gas extraction, advocates for the protection of animal habitats and opposes land clearing.
Criticism: Though not as prevalent in this election, the AJP has fielded some extreme positions in the past regarding government policies designed to encourage veganism and so forth (though note their policy on human diets for a continuation of the position to some extent). This rhetoric has been toned down, and most criticism now seems to focus on objections to specific policies, but it is up to the voter to decide if they think this represents a moderation of the party's views or a shift of declared policy to win votes while the original views are still held.

Party H: Liberal Party (LIB)

Policy Website: https://strongplan.com.au/policies/
Policy Highlights: More Jobs; Lower Costs; Better Services (Source: 'Policies'.)
More Jobs: The Libs have identified a range of policies they believe will produce new jobs or preserve old ones. Some of these are vague, like keeping defence jobs in SA by "working... to identify global projects being delivered by Adelaide-based primes" or producing more traineeships by "encouraging flexible apprenticeship pathways". Others, such as deregulation of business trading hours, ending payroll tax for small businesses and investing in frastructure, are far more concrete.
Lower Costs: The main cost-lowering strategy of the Liberals is a wide range of tax cuts: ending the aforementioned payroll tax for small businesses, reducing the emergency services levy and land tax, not introducing a bank tax, and capping natural resource management levies and council rates. Additionally, the party wants free screening for some volunteers, and to reduce water and power prices (again, often by vaguely described instruments).
Better Services: Many services being made "better" are in the health sector, contrasting with Labor's issues with hospital closures, the new RAH and the case of false cancer test results. These include funding the continued opperation of the Repat hospital, more cardiac services in the QEH, investment in various specialist departments and (particularly regional) hospitals, and building a new Womens' and Childrens' hospital. Other services getting investment or upgrade include the CFS, higher education (particularly TAFE) and support for soldiers and veretans.
Criticism: The main criticism I have heard of the Liberals this election is that they dont seem to stand for much except being not Labor. This is probably why there has been so much emphasis on the Strong Plan the Libs are promoting. There are definitely many concrete measures that the Liberal party is proposing; at the same time, undeniably, they are pushing for a change of government on the argument that labor has been in for 16 years and made some major mistakes in the last term regarding child safety, old age care etc.

Party I: Child Protection Party (CPP)

Policy Website: https://www.childprotectionparty.com.au/policies
Policy Highlights: The CPP is, unsurprisingly, a single-issue party. Among the many arms to its child protection policy are strict rules around adoption, but encouraging adoption as an option where parental care is not possible or inappropriate; supports same-sex adoption; encourages foster caring and an end to residential care, mandatory abuse education in schools, custody and child welfare issues to be resolved outside of the court system and all social workers should be registered. The party also supports renewable energy and reductions of Co2 emissions.
Criticism: I have not heard any criticisms of this party specifically, but it has the same limitations of all (mostly) single-issue parties--overallocation of focus on one (admittedly) important issue and no known position on other matters they will have to vote on.

Party J: Australian Conservatives (AC)

Policy Website: https://www.conservatives.org.au/our_policies
Policy Highlights: Limited Government and Personal Responsibility; Free Enterprise; Stronger Families and Civil Society (Source: 'Our Principles'. For conciseness, these five principles have been combined into three: Small Government, Free Enterprise and Traditional Values.)
Small Government: A lot of the policies realting to reform of government and its agencies are worded specifically to opperate at the federal level, though many could be applied at a state level. These include reducing welfare payments, ending benefits to retired politicians and reducing government controlls on the markets in favour of free market principles.
Free Enterprise: The Australian Conservatives advocate for lower taxes to stimulate the economy and promote job growth, energy production to be determined by whatever method is cheapest (rather than favouring e.g. renewable/green energy for ideological reasons) and support for free markets.
Traditional Values: This party is concerend by what it sees as propaganda in schools and bias on government-funded broadcasters. The Conservatives celebrate Australia's Judeo-Christian heritage, consider traditional (i.e. heterosexual) marriage the basis of society, wants greater restrictions on imigration, and believes "Australia needs a realistic approach to the challenges of Islam."
Criticism: The criticism of the Conservatives is simple: they are too conservative. Their policies have been viewed as racist, sexist and homophobic, and suffer all the limitations and criticisms the far right has always faced. Aditionally, all of the policies considered here are designed primarily for federal politics and there are no dedicated South Australian policies available.

Party K: Australian Labor Party (ALP)

Party Website: https://sa.alp.org.au/
Policy Highlights: Jobs; Energy; Education; Health (Source: main page)
Jobs: With regards to providing jobs, the ALP intends to invest in infrastructure, green energy and power storage and fast internet both as sources of emplyment and essentials to businesses in a modern economny. They also intend to secure more jobs from interstate and overseas by attracting companies like Boeing, the Australian Shipbuilding Authority, Tesla and others from industries including defence, energy, mining, tourism, IT and future digital industries, and space technology.
Energy: Labor promises to improve cheap, reliable and green energy through its promotion of electric cars, renewable energy and its energy storage cooperation with Tesla. They also want to consolidate essential services including power to prevent privatisation.
Education: Investment in primary, secondary and teritary education forms the obvious backbone to this policy. This includes infrastructure, internet upgrades and special needs funding.
Health: Again, Labor's policy is dominated by a list of spending initiatives: mental health, preventative measures, suicide prevention, drug addiction services, and medical research are all listed for funding. Additionally, Labor is touting its 'no-jab, no-pay' policy as a win for South Australian health due to its success in boosting vaccinations.
Criticism: The main problem the ALP faces this year is winning a fifth term. There have been some major dramas including constatnt issues with the RAH, the Oakden abuse scandal and Families SA abuse scandal, and general criticisms are also levied regarding high tax rates and shrinking job opportunities. As such, many people feel Labor has been in power too long and it is time for a change.

Party L: Independent Amrik Singh Thandi (AST)

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AmrikSThandi/
Policy Highlights: Operating out of a Facebook account makes it hard to organise detailed policies into an easily assessable format. I have not been able to identify the key policy positions of Amrik Singh Thandi, but in his only English-language video he identifies among his priorities improving Infrastructure, harsher punishments for domestic violence, better education, support for small business and local jobs, support for aged care & child care, improving housing, promoting tourism and developing the state's transport. (Source: 'video').
Criticism: Thandi's group is so little known there is little criticism available. My own personal observation is that there is very little detail about any of the groups policies and how they intend to implement them. That doesn't necessarily say much against the group, but it also makes it hard to passionately support them unless you have met or otehrwise know the candidates.

Ungrouped: Gail Kilby

Policy Website: https://www.votegailkilby.com/what-gail-stands-for
Policy Highlights: Detailed policy appears to be absent from Cr Kilby's site, so i will paste the most relevant section in whole here:

I stand for,
- Increasing Job Opportunities
- Equity and Fairness for all South Australians
- Improving our Health and Education System
- Sound, intelligent and practical legislation
- Honest, Transparent and accountable Decision Making

Of the three videos on her site and all of the materials on her campaign facebook, I was able to identify one policy: making education more accessable for people of all ages. No further details are available at this time.

Criticism: Normally it is hard to find much on ungrouped candidates, and even less publically against them. However the very first google result for Cr Kilby is a news story in the Advertiser (via the Southern Times Messenger) outlining a dispute between her and a fellow councillor that "has already cost ratepayers $20,000" and included allegations against Cr Kilby of sexism against a male colleague.

Ungrouped: John Milton Le Raye (Danig Party of Australia)

Party Website: https://www.danigpartysa.com/
Policy Highlights: You know you have a publicity issue when a search for your name as per the ballot turns up an ad for your old car before your campaign site. According to the electoral comission, however, Le Raye is standing for the Danig party, so I am running with that. Their policy PDF outlines 16 principles, but there is no convenient means of selecting those they would want highlighted. I normally try to keep the key points to 3 or 4 but with these 16 I've decided to do a quick-fire summary:

Unemployed people should be conscripted; government should adequately support people with disabilities; eating Australian food should be incentivised; better education would be better; stronger courts, police and firefighters (some of whom should be run by the air force); compulsory pre-marital counseling; renewable energy ASAP; end logging old-growth forrests; no government debt; Australian farms should be immune to bank forclosure; Super should be paid to the government and pensions paid instead; Greater protections for (unsecured) creditors; register of bad tennants; immigration is ok; illegal immigration is not ok; review driving fines and give free driver training.

Criticism: Couldn't find any public criticism of Mr Le Raye or the Danig Party. That said, there are many vocal opponents of compulsory military service, renewable energy or large-scale immigration.

Ungrouped: Luke Koumi

Some forum in which the candidate, or someone claiming to be him, appears to post: https://www.punters.com.au/forum/horse-racing/racing-means-jobs-%F0%9F%98%83-please-vote-for-luke-koumi-at-the-sa-election_99885/
Policy Highlights: Right at the bottom of the list and finding policy information is getting REALLY tough. The link above includes posts from Paintedponies who sometimes appears to be writing as though (s)he is the candidate and sometimes as though (s)he is a supporter by referring to Mr Koumi in the third person. I hate to rely on such an unreliable source, but it's all I have and it still offers no insight into policies beyond the fact that a vote for Luke Koumi (running for 'Racing means Jobs') is a vote for the horse racing industry generally and for jumps racing specifically.
Criticism: Assuming Paintedponies is Mr Koumi (and I cannot caviat that enough) then the most damming criticism of this candidate I could find was written by the candidate himself. Here is his comment, straight from the ... horses mouth:

I once had a heated discussion with a borderline morbidly obese lady who tried to tell me horseracing was cruel. After I’d exhausted all my arguments to say that it’s not..I finally told her that her allowing her children to suffer as overweight young humans was what was really cruel. She didn’t talk to me anymore after that 😅.

Legislative Assembly (Lower House)

How to Vote: In the Legislative Assembly, every box must be numbered with '1' being the first ppreference. There are 47 electorates, each with a different set of candidates running. Find your electorate below to see what candidates you can vote for. Partes without links have their policies outlined above fore the Legislative Council; others link to the best source I have for the candidate--it is too labour intensive to write out policy sumaries for each and many links (those marked *) have little to no useful information. Unless you live in the seat of Mount Gambier there will be at most one link to follow (and most are generally very brief).

Adelaide       

1	PRICE, Betty-Jean	Dignity Party Inc
2	SIMMS, Robert	The Greens
3	CHAPLEY, Jo	Australian Labor Party
4	SANDERSON, Rachel	Liberal Party

       

Badcoe       

1	BICKFORD, Kate	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	CLYNE, Lachlan	Liberal Party
3	STINSON, Jayne	Australian Labor Party
4	DURKIN, Lily	Dignity Party Inc
5	WOODWARD, John	Independent Practical Experienced
6	ROZITIS, Stef	The Greens
7	MUNRO, Robyn	Australian Conservatives

       

Black       

1	WILSON, Randall	Australian Labor Party
2	ZSCHECH, Lionel	Australian Conservatives
3	de JONGE, Rob	Independent South Australia Better*
4	BARNES, Dami	The Greens
5	SVETLICHNY, Anastasia	Dignity Party Inc
6	SPEIRS, David	Liberal Party

Bragg       

1	ZWAANS, Neil	The Greens
2	SARRE, Rick	Australian Labor Party
3	CHAPMAN, Vickie	Liberal Party
4	NEAGLE, Taylah	Dignity Party Inc

Chaffey       

1	CAMPBELL, Michelle	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	CHALLIS, Richard	Dignity Party Inc
3	WHETSTONE, Tim	Liberal Party
4	POINTER, Philip	The Greens
5	SCOTT, Trevor	Australian Conservatives
6	SINGH-MALHI, Sim	Australian Labor Party

Cheltenham       

1	WEATHERILL, Jay	Australian Labor Party
2	MEDROW, Steffi	The Greens
3	SCALI, Vincent	Independent Hadd Enuf*
4	PRATT, Penny	Liberal Party
5	NOONAN, John Anthony	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
6	McCAUL, Madeline	Dignity Party Inc

Colton       

1	PETHERICK, Paul	The Greens
2	WOOD, Jassmine	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
3	COWDREY, Matt	Liberal Party
4	EVANS, Ted	Dignity Party Inc
5	VAUGHAN, Angela	Australian Labor Party

Croydon       

1	HAMMERSTEIN, Millie	Animal Justice Party
2	HEXTELL, Daria	Liberal Party
3	MALINAUSKAS, Peter	Australian Labor Party
4	LESIW, Michael	Independent*
5	LANGE, Nathan	The Greens
6	McGINLEY, Lucy	Dignity Party Inc
7	KARPATHAKIS, Julia	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
8	RUNNER, Rachael	Australian Conservatives
9	GESTI, Gabor	Danig Party of Australia (See John Milton Le Raye)

Davenport       

1	PHOTAKIS, John	The Greens
2	GOLDING, Dan	Independent*
3	HOCKLEY, Karen	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
4	MURRAY, Steve	Liberal Party
5	THORSTEINSEN, Jonette	Australian Labor Party

Dunstan       

1	MARSHALL, Steven	Liberal Party
2	NOONAN, Jack	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
3	DE KOK, Harriet	The Greens
4	LOADER, Matt	Australian Labor Party
5	WILSON, Ben	Dignity Party Inc

Elder       

1	HABIB, Carolyn	Liberal Party
2	SLATTERY, Michael	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
3	VAN GROESEN, Shawn	Australian Conservatives
4	DIGANCE, Annabel	Australian Labor Party
5	SCHUMI, Nick	Dignity Party Inc
6	MOATE, Jody	The Greens

Elizabeth       

1	ODENWALDER, Lee	Australian Labor Party
2	MATHIESEN, John	Australian Conservatives
3	BYRNE, Sharka	Liberal Party
4	GALLASCH, Phil	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	MORGAN, Wendy	The Greens

Enfield       

1	ALVEY, Cassie	The Greens
2	EDMONDS, Steve	Australian Conservatives
3	CRESDEE, Emma	Dignity Party Inc
4	MATHEW, Deepa	Liberal Party
5	MARTIN, Carol	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
6	RAU, John	Australian Labor Party

Finniss       

1	SKINNER, Russell	Australian Labor Party
2	MULLETTE, Marc	The Greens
3	HILL, Joe	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
4	HICKS, Bruce	Australian Conservatives
5	BASHAM, David	Liberal Party

Flinders       

1	DUDLEY, Ian	The Greens
2	TRELOAR, Peter	Liberal Party
3	WATSON, Julie	Australian Labor Party
4	PARKER, Tony	Australian Conservatives

Florey       

1	BEDFORD, Frances	Independent Community Counts
2	GATT, Adam	The Greens
3	WAECHTER, Suzi	Dignity Party Inc
4	MORRIS, Rik	Australian Labor Party
5	PEAKE, John	Australian Conservatives
6	SHARMA, Gagan	Liberal Party
7	RUSSELL, Geoff	Animal Justice Party

Frome       

1	BIRKWOOD, Paul	The Greens
2	BROCK, Geoff	Independent
3	JACKSON, Kendall	Liberal Party
4	CONNOR, Cat	Dignity Party Inc
5	ELLIOT, Annette	Australian Labor Party

Gibson       

1	HANNA, Kris	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	CAREY, Matthew	Australian Labor Party
3	CONNOR, Garry	Dignity Party Inc
4	ROZITISOLDS, Gwydion	The Greens
5	WINGARD, Corey	Liberal Party

Giles       

1	TAYLOR, Anna	The Greens
2	WESTERMAN, Cyanne	Dignity Party Inc
3	KAMINSKI, Cheryl	Australian Conservatives
4	HUGHES, Eddie	Australian Labor Party
5	WALSH, Mark	Liberal Party
6	ANTONIO, Tom	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST

Hammond       

1	HOPE, Simon	The Greens
2	PEDERICK, Adrian	Liberal Party
3	O'BRIEN, Mat	Australian Labor Party
4	GLADIGAU, Kelly	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	PATON, Declan	Australian Conservatives

Hartley       

1	RYAN, Marijka	Independent Voice in Hartley
2	JACKSON, Bob	Australian Conservatives
3	PORTOLESI, Grace	Australian Labor Party
4	NEAGLE, Rick	Dignity Party Inc
5	TARZIA, Vincent	Liberal Party
6	ZWAANS, Lauren	The Greens
7	XENOPHON, Nick	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST

Heysen        

1	STEVENSON, Lynette	Australian Conservatives
2	WEBB, Tony	Australian Labor Party
3	VONOW, Lynton	The Greens
4	ILLINGWORTH, John	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	TEAGUE, Josh	Liberal Party
6	EY, Andrew	Dignity Party Inc

Hurtle Vale       

1	CRESDEE, Donovan	Dignity Party Inc
2	DUFF, Aaron	Liberal Party
3	COOK, Nat	Australian Labor Party
4	O'BRIEN, Michael	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	MALCOLM, Bruce	Australian Conservatives
6	MORTIER, Nikki	The Greens

Kaurna       

1	McMAHON, Simon	Liberal Party
2	CULLEN-MACASKILL, Sean	The Greens
3	PICTON, Chris	Australian Labor Party

Kavel       

1	GROSSER, Ian	The Greens
2	DALLIMORE, Glen	Australian Labor Party
3	STRATFORD, Andrew	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
4	HOLLOW, Howard	Australian Conservatives
5	RODERT, Cristina	Dignity Party Inc
6	PFEIFFER, Louise	Animal Justice Party
7	CREGAN, Dan	Liberal Party

King       

1	ADAMS, Damon	The Greens
2	ROSITANO, Giles	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
3	BALFORT, Gary	Australian Conservatives
4	DUNCAN, Julie	Australian Labor Party
5	LUETHEN, Paula	Liberal Party

Lee       

1	JESSOP, Vicki	Australian Conservatives
2	KERPELIS, Aristidis	Danig Party of Australia (See John Milton Le Raye)
3	RYPP, Steven	Liberal Party
4	LEGRAND, Andy	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	MULLIGHAN, Stephen	Australian Labor Party
6	LITTLER, Tiffany	Dignity Party Inc
7	O'SULLIVAN, Patrick	The Greens

Light       

1	TEUSNER, Carl	Australian Conservatives
2	McCOLL, Karen	Liberal Party
3	PICCOLO, Tony	Australian Labor Party
4	GREEN, Felicity	The Greens

MacKillop       

1	HILL, Tracy	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	BATEMAN, Richard	Australian Conservatives
3	EY, Jon	Independent*
4	WIGG, Hilary	Australian Labor Party
5	McBRIDE, Nick	Liberal Party
6	PETERS, Donella	The Greens

Mawson       

1	WAINWRIGHT, Hazel	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	HARRISON, Ami-Louise	The Greens
3	GREAVES, Heidi	Australian Conservatives
4	GILFILLAN, Andy	Liberal Party
5	BIGNELL, Leon	Australian Labor Party

Morialta       

1	FARROW, Tim	Dignity Party Inc
2	GARDNER, John	Liberal Party
3	FIELD, Peter	Australian Labor Party
4	SMITH, Matt	Australian Conservatives
5	ROBERTS-THOMSON, Simon	The Greens
6	SADLER, James	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
7	SMYTHE, Peter	Independent Australian Democrats

Morphett       

1	SIEBENTRITT, Mark	Australian Labor Party
2	KWAN, Monica	Dignity Party Inc
3	JONES, Simon	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
4	McFETRIDGE, Duncan	Independent
5	CRABBE, Chris	The Greens
6	PATTERSON, Stephen	Liberal Party

Mount Gambier       

1	AMOROSO, Kate	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	JONES, Lance	Dignity Party Inc
3	BELL, Troy	Independent
4	BISSET, Gregg	Australian Conservatives
5	SCRIVEN, Isabel	Australian Labor Party
6	MARSH, Craig	Liberal Party
7	CLARKE, Gavin	The Greens
8	SAGE, Richard	Independent*

Narungga       

1	HEWETT, Rebecca	Australian Conservatives
2	MILERA, Douglas	Australian Labor Party
3	SWALES, Jason	The Greens
4	ELLIS, Fraser	Liberal Party
5	DAVIES, Sam	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST

Newland       

1	STEWART, Stephanie	The Greens
2	LEEDHAM, Martin	Australian Conservatives
3	BAILEY, Shane	Independent*
4	HARVEY, Richard	Liberal Party
5	VASAN, Rajini	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
6	WILLIAMS, Sandra	Dignity Party Inc
7	KENYON, Tom	Australian Labor Party

Playford       

1	SZUTY, Helen	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	SHEORAN, Shane	Australian Conservatives
3	LE CERF, Brock	The Greens
4	BROWN, Michael	Australian Labor Party
5	DAVE, Hemant	Liberal Party

Port Adelaide       

1	TINGEY, Bryan	Dignity Party Inc
2	HANCOCK, Nicholas	Animal Justice Party
3	JOHANSON, Gary	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
4	McLAREN, Chad	Liberal Party
5	MOORS, Danica	The Greens
6	MATTHEWS, Peter	Danig Party of Australia (See John Milton Le Raye)
7	CLOSE, Susan	Australian Labor Party
8	HAMBOUR, Bruce	Australian Conservatives

Ramsay        

1	ALDRIDGE, Mark	Independent Representing You
2	FERRIS, Brett	The Greens
3	CHARLES, Nick	Liberal Party
4	IALEGGIO, Domenico	Australian Conservatives
5	BETTISON, Zoe	Australian Labor Party
6	GEORGE, Tarnia	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST

Reynell       

1	TREE, Anna	Dignity Party Inc
2	HILDYARD, Katrine	Australian Labor Party
3	CURRAN, Laura	Liberal Party
4	MAUSOLF, Joanne	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	JURY, Daniel	The Greens
6	SIRES, David	Australian Conservatives

Schubert       

1	HAEBICH, David	Australian Labor Party
2	BROWN, Paul	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
3	IRVING, Dave	The Greens
4	KNOLL, Stephan	Liberal Party
5	LAMBERT, Rikki	Australian Conservatives

Stuart       

1	FITZGERALD, Brendan	The Greens
2	van HOLST PELLEKAAN, Dan	Liberal Party
3	THOMAS, Khatija	Australian Labor Party

Taylor       

1	TAYLOR, Sonja	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
2	RANDELL, Kate	The Greens
3	BRADLEY, Danny	Australian Conservatives
4	SHARMA, Sarika	Liberal Party
5	GEE, Jon	Australian Labor Party

Torrens        

1	DUTHIE, John	Dignity Party Inc
2	WORTLEY, Dana	Australian Labor Party
3	KENNY, Therese	Liberal Party
4	DINOVITSER, Alex	The Greens

Unley       

1	PISONI, David	Liberal Party
2	PHILLIPS, Geoff	Australian Labor Party
3	WISHART, John	The Greens
4	OLIVIER, Anthony	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	CENTRELLA, Dario	Stop Population Growth Now
6	WATKINS, Anne	Dignity Party Inc

Waite        

1	TUCKER, Cathi	Dignity Party Inc
2	DUNCAN, John	Australian Conservatives
3	HUTCHESSON, Cathy	Australian Labor Party
4	DAVIES, Graham	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	DULUK, Sam	Liberal Party
6	WHITE, Brendan	The Greens

West Torrens       

1	BEDDALL, Phillip	Dignity Party Inc
2	FORZA, Livio	The Greens
3	KOUTSANTONIS, Tom	Australian Labor Party
4	DIMAS, Josh	Danig Party of Australia (See John Milton Le Raye)
5	CRUZ, Helika	Liberal Party

Wright         

1	BOYER, Blair	Australian Labor Party
2	MESISCA, Luigi	Liberal Party
3	HARNESS, Jennifer	The Greens
4	HENNINGSEN, Natasha	Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST
5	DENNIS, Eric	Australian Conservatives